This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team
With over 14 years of experience, do you consider law to be a planned choice for you? What was your motivation to pursue this field?
It was certainly not the case in the beginning. Back in the early 2000s as students of a government school, we didn’t know any better than doing engineering. However, once I started giving the entrance examinations, I realised that I’ll not make it into the elite government institutions, and I felt it would be a waste of time, money, and effort to graduate from a mediocre university. Around this time, a friend mentioned he was taking law entrance exams, which was news to me—I hadn’t known that law colleges had entrance exams! This was pre-CLAT, so each university had its own exam, and deadlines for many had already passed. Among the remaining options, I was waitlisted at a National Law University, which led me to consider alternatives. By this time I became really passionate about Law, Polity and Jurisprudence. I got an admission in DES Law College, Pune and loved it so much that I did not even try elsewhere. Rest, as they say, is history.
With more than a decade of experience across different sectors, what inspired you to focus on mediation as an additional vertical in your office? Could you share a specific example from your mediation practice where you successfully navigated a particularly challenging dispute?
Mediation is a relatively new vertical in my chambers. I was selected for mediation training by Samadhan – the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre in 2019 but only qualified in 2022. No, I did not flunk! The pandemic years delayed the process.
My interest in mediation grew as I witnessed how timely intervention by expert mediators resolved issues without prolonged litigation. If you follow the news, mediators are being appointed in various disputes including between governments.
There are many complex mediations and each brings its own unique challenges. Family disputes are often emotionally charged, while corporate disputes tend to involve parties digging their heels in and refusing to change their positions. However, most rewarding mediation for me was one where I got the matter settled between a Music Company and a Government Department. Government officials are often reluctant to settle, fearing accusations of corruption. Navigating this case was challenging due to the power imbalance between the parties, but through structured dialogue over multiple sessions, we managed to salvage the relationship and reach a mutually beneficial agreement.
During your early years of practice alongside senior advocates, what key lessons did you learn that significantly shaped your legal career?
My first office taught me the importance of efficiency and understanding all aspects of practice. In a boutique law firm, it is easy to be inundated with work and get burned out. from drafting to filing, handling registry objections, getting matters listed, and even standing in for seniors. This experience made me self-sufficient quite early on in my career.
My second office is where I actually felt mentored. Just like me, my senior was also a first generation advocate. When I asked him about which specialisation or field of law should I concentrate on, he told me to “Just be an Advocate” and the clients will determine what they want to engage you for. Working with a senior advocate taught me the art of strategy and patience. Observing his approach to complex cases, I learned that thorough preparation and clear communication are crucial. These early experiences instilled a respect for detail, discipline, and the importance of upholding integrity in advocacy.
You also undertake legal-aid activities. How has your experience with the Delhi High Court Legal Services Committee influenced your perspective on access to justice for marginalised communities?
It has been a rich and rewarding experience. My work with the Delhi High Court Legal Services Committee reinforced my desire for inclusive access to justice. Through this role, I’ve seen firsthand the hurdles that marginalized individuals face. The idea is to ensure that legal aid to the poor is not poor legal aid. Recognizing that equitable access to legal assistance is essential for a fair justice system has deepened my commitment to pro bono work.
Having argued various landmark cases and the most recent of them being Balaji Exim v. Commissioner, CGST reported in 2023 (73) G.S.T.L. 350 (Del.). Can you share a few insights with us regarding the key legal principles involved in your approach to the case?
I don’t think one can plan to get any landmark case. In each case, one should keep an open mind and look at the issue thoroughly from all angles. In Balaji Exim, a critical point was upholding procedural fairness in GST adjudication. The department was implementing a constricted reading of the law in case of Input Tax Credit by denying the recipient benefit because of an ongoing investigation against the supplier. We argued that suspicion cannot be a ground for denial of credit. The court agreed and observed that the accusation of availing fake credit by the supplier could not be a ground for rejecting the petitioner’s refund application of ITC unless it is proved that the petitioner has not received the delivery of goods or had not paid for them. Our approach aimed to balance statutory interpretation with principles that prevent arbitrary power.
After working with various Law Offices for 4 years you established your own practice. What motivated this transition and what were the initial challenges that you faced?
There’s never a perfect time to go independent; it’s a leap of faith. As long as one is learning and growing, it’s natural to stay associated with an office. However, at some point of time, we must ask ourselves the hard question. Do you wish to climb the corporate ladder of a firm or fly solo? I was very clear that I enjoy being the counsel the most and that is the most important thing for me. It helped that my senior allowed me to take up my own matters so the transition was not so sudden.
I started my chambers with a total of 3 good clients. So the initial challenge was to get more clients and make enough money to sustain the people who have decided to be part of your whimsical dream. I spent all my savings on setting up the office and it would have been very easy to call it quits. Fortunately, the staff was cooperative and clients also spread word of mouth. After some years, the next set of challenges emerge which is hiring the right people and putting processes in place so your ability to do everything on your own does not become an inefficient obsession.
How do you stay updated on the evolving dynamics of Indirect Tax Laws, such as GST, Customs, Central Excise, Service Tax, FEMA, Foreign Trade Policy, Anti-Dumping Duty, and related regulations, particularly from an international perspective?
Indirect tax is just like any other field of law that requires you to go through recent decisions, amendments and government notifications. The only issue is that these are far more frequent when compared with the traditional fields. Therefore, staying updated involves a multi-pronged approach—regularly reviewing amendments, studying landmark judgments, attending seminars, and engaging with professional networks globally. The practicing advocates of CESTAT also have a very helpful WhatsApp group for new developments in the field. Additionally, I try to follow developments in international politics, as these often influence policies domestically.
As the founder of your law chambers, how do you ensure effective communication workflow while balancing it with your personal life?
I prioritize streamlined communication within my chambers by implementing clear protocols and encouraging teamwork. I avoid micro-management as it is very frustrating and time consuming. Instead, I delegate and only follow up on specified deadlines. Since we are a small team, everyone is comfortable directly approaching me in case of an issue they are not able to resolve themselves. On a personal level, I allocate time for family and personal well-being, which helps me stay balanced and focused. Unfortunately, through all this, sleep sometimes is a casualty but I am actively trying to remedy that.
You frequently visit various law colleges and universities for guest lectures and chairing various competitions. What advice do you give to the younger generation who wish to achieve excellence in the field of law?
To quote a Louis Armstrong song, “They’ll learn much more than I have ever known”. It is hard to give advice to the younger generation who already have vast knowledge and exposure. But since you have asked for it, my advice is to cultivate perseverance, curiosity, and ethical integrity. Law is demanding and requires continuous learning. Be open to mentorship, value hard work, and, most importantly, understand that building a reputable practice takes persistent dedication over time.
Get in touch with Abhas Mishra-
