This interview has been published by Namrata Singh and The SuperLawyer Team
Can you share what inspired you to pursue a career in law and how you embarked on this journey?
Growing up, I always had a keen interest in understanding the intricacies of systems, whether economic, social, or legal. However, after completing my Economics Honors degree, I was still determining my next steps and decided to take the Delhi University LLB exam. The decision to sit for the Delhi University LLB exam was initially driven by practical considerations; law seemed like a vocational course with promising career prospects.
However, as I delved into my law studies, I developed a keen interest in commercial laws, particularly in the area of Intellectual Property (IP). This interest was sparked during internships at leading IP firms, where I witnessed the importance of trademarks and other IP elements in protecting business identities and innovations. My enthusiasm for law translated into academic success; I consistently ranked among the top 5% of my batch, which comprised around 800 students. My dedication led to an opportunity with Anand & Anand, a prestigious IP firm, which marked the beginning of my professional journey in law. What started as a pragmatic decision evolved into a fulfilling career focused on the intricate and impactful field of IP law.
You’ve managed high-stakes litigation for leading companies. Can you describe one of the most challenging cases you’ve handled and the key takeaways from that experience?
In my career, I’ve been involved in several trademark litigations, successfully enforcing rights related to brand names, logos, trade dresses, copyrights, and other similar IP rights. One of the most challenging cases I’m currently handling is an ongoing appeal at the Delhi High Court in a patent matter. The dispute centers around the appropriate jurisdiction for filing an appeal against a refusal order issued by the Delhi Patent Office, despite the patent application being initially filed in Mumbai. We contend that the Delhi High Court should have jurisdiction since the refusal order was passed in Delhi.
The case took a complex turn when a single judge bench at the Delhi High Court declared the appeal non-maintainable. We have now escalated the matter to a division bench, seeking a reconsideration of the jurisdictional issue. This case is particularly intriguing as it could set a precedent for similar jurisdictional disputes in IP law. The outcome will significantly impact the strategic considerations for patent litigation in India. The ongoing appeal is a testament to the complexities and nuances involved in IP litigation and underscores the importance of jurisdictional clarity in legal proceedings. [FILO EDTECH INC. Vs UNION OF INDIA LPA 375/2024]
As an expert in Intellectual Property Law, what do you consider the most critical elements when managing trademark prosecution and litigation?
In managing trademark prosecution and litigation, I find that the most critical elements revolve around preparation, strategy, and adaptability. First and foremost, comprehensive research is key. Before filing a trademark, it’s crucial to conduct thorough searches to ensure the mark is distinctive and doesn’t infringe on existing rights. This groundwork helps avoid potential conflicts and sets a solid foundation for the trademark’s protection.
Another important aspect is strategic planning. Anticipating challenges whether, during the prosecution phase or in potential litigation, allows us to develop a proactive approach. For instance, being prepared for opposition or knowing when to negotiate versus litigate can significantly influence the outcome.
Communication also plays a vital role. Clear and persuasive communication with clients, examiners, and even opposing parties can make a big difference. Whether, it’s drafting responses to office actions or presenting arguments in court, articulating our position effectively is crucial.
Lastly, I believe in staying adaptive and informed. The landscape of IP law is constantly evolving, so keeping up with the latest legal developments and industry trends is essential. This not only helps in staying ahead of the curve but also in providing the best possible advice to clients.
Overall, it’s a mix of thorough preparation, strategic thinking, clear communication, and continuous learning that I find most critical in managing trademark prosecution and litigation.
What emerging trends in corporate and intellectual property law do you believe will shape the future of legal practice, and how should legal professionals prepare for these changes?
Emerging trends in corporate and intellectual property law are increasingly shaped by advancements in technology, particularly AI. AI is revolutionizing how we draft legal documents, from contracts to IP pleadings, by streamlining the process and handling repetitive tasks more efficiently. This shift is exciting because it allows us to focus more on the strategic aspects of our work and provides clients with faster turnaround times. However, while AI can handle many routine tasks, we legal professionals must remember that the nuanced understanding and strategic insight we bring to the table can’t be replicated by machines.
To prepare for these changes, we need to embrace technology and stay updated on the latest tools and trends. Learning how to use AI effectively will enhance our productivity, but we should also focus on developing skills that complement these tools, such as critical thinking and personalized client interactions. By combining technological proficiency with our unique legal expertise, we can continue to add significant value and remain indispensable in a rapidly evolving legal landscape.
You developed an online certificate course on Copyrights for Lawctopus. How do you see the role of online education in shaping the future of legal training?
Online education is revolutionizing legal training by making valuable knowledge more accessible and affordable. Platforms like Lawctopus, where I developed a course on Copyrights, exemplify how online courses provide keen learners with the opportunity to dive deep into specialized areas of law without the constraints of traditional, lengthy, and costly degrees. For me, online courses have been a game-changer. When I wanted to expand my practice to include complex corporate law assignments such as multi-jurisdictional M&As, advisory on equity structures, cross-border transactions, and corporate restructuring, these well-crafted courses allowed me to gain the necessary expertise efficiently and economically.
The beauty of online education lies in its ability to offer flexible learning options that cater to various levels of expertise and interest. It empowers professionals to stay current with evolving legal trends and deepen their knowledge base, all from the comfort of their own homes. This democratization of education not only enhances individual careers but also contributes to a more knowledgeable and agile legal community.
Outside of your professional life, do you have any hobbies or interests that you feel contribute to your legal thinking or problem-solving skills?
Outside of my professional life, my hobbies play a significant role in enhancing my legal thinking and problem-solving skills. I’m an avid reader with a broad range of interests, including fiction, history, and philosophy. Additionally, I have a strong interest in personal development literature, which offers valuable insights into human behaviour and decision-making. This diverse reading habit sharpens my critical thinking and helps me approach legal issues from multiple perspectives, enriching my problem-solving abilities.
Travelling is another passion that complements my legal work. Exploring different cultures and engaging with people from various backgrounds provides me with unique viewpoints and approaches to problem-solving. This exposure fosters a more adaptable and open-minded approach, which is essential for tackling complex legal challenges. Both reading widely and travelling allow me to bring fresh insights and innovative solutions to my legal practice.
As someone deeply involved in the legal aspects of emerging technologies, what do you see as the most pressing IP challenges in areas like AI and cybersecurity?
In the realm of AI, one major challenge is defining and protecting intellectual property rights for innovations that are driven by machine learning algorithms. Determining ownership of AI-generated inventions or works can be complex, especially when AI systems are creating novel solutions without direct human intervention. This raises questions about patentability and copyright, and whether current IP frameworks are adequate for these advancements.
In cybersecurity, the challenge is ensuring that our intellectual property is safe from cyber threats. One notable example was when I was involved in a case where a company’s proprietary encryption algorithms were compromised during a sophisticated cyber-attack. The breach not only jeopardized their trade secrets but also raised complex questions about the effectiveness of their security measures and their legal obligations to protect their IP.
A key technical challenge here was understanding the intricacies of how the encryption was bypassed. This required working closely with cybersecurity experts to assess the vulnerability and determine how it could have been exploited. We had to delve into the specifics of the encryption technology, analyze the breach, and then figure out how to fortify the IP protection moving forward. This experience highlighted the need for a legal approach that’s deeply integrated with the technical aspects of cybersecurity. It’s not just about having legal protections in place but also understanding the technology to ensure that our IP safeguards are robust and adaptable to evolving threats.
Considering your diverse experience, if you could create a new area of IP law to address future challenges, what would it be and why?
If I could create a new area of IP law, it would focus on AI-generated innovations and Ownership Rights. As AI technology advances, it’s increasingly capable of generating new inventions, designs, and creative works autonomously. However, current IP frameworks are struggling to keep up with these developments, particularly in defining ownership and protection for AI-generated outputs.
The new area of law would address several key issues: establishing clear guidelines for determining ownership of AI-generated inventions, defining the role of human contributors versus AI systems, and creating a framework for protecting AI-created intellectual property. This would involve setting standards for patent and copyright eligibility when an AI is the primary creator and resolving disputes related to the rights of the developers versus the AI itself.
This proposed IP domain is crucial because it would ensure that as AI continues to innovate, the legal system can adequately protect and manage these advancements. It would help address the gaps in current IP laws and provide a structured approach to the future of creativity and invention in the age of AI.
You’ve witnessed the rise of digital platforms and their impact on IP. How do you envision trademark and copyright law evolving to address challenges in the digital space?
On the trademark front, online counterfeiting is a significant menace that demands more effective legal measures. In the digital landscape, where brands are prevalent across social media, online marketplaces, and app stores, companies face persistent issues with unauthorized use of their trademarks. This often involves numerous counterfeiters operating anonymously or under false identities, making it challenging to address each instance individually. Therefore, trademark law needs to implement more robust policies and practices to combat these widespread infringements efficiently. Instead of pursuing multiple litigations against individual offenders, we need a streamlined approach that can address these issues comprehensively and proactively.
As regards copyright, the digital revolution has made it incredibly easy to copy and distribute content, which complicates enforcement. I’ve dealt with cases where copyrighted materials were pirated across multiple platforms, making it a daunting task to track and address infringement. The law will need to evolve with better digital rights management tools and more effective takedown procedures. Additionally, as user-generated content becomes more widespread, we need to rethink how copyright law balances protecting original works by accommodating the way people build upon and remix existing content. This may involve developing new legal frameworks that both safeguard the rights of original creators and support the collaborative and adaptive nature of digital creativity.
As someone who’s navigated law firms, what insights can you share about the different dynamics and challenges in these environments?
Navigating law firms across different cities has given me a unique perspective on the varying dynamics and challenges in these environments. While the essence of law firms remains consistent—a client-driven focus aiming to provide top-notch services and build strong portfolios—there are notable differences influenced by local practices and court systems.
For instance, I’ve observed distinct operational nuances between law firms in cities like Delhi and Mumbai. The Delhi High Court and the Bombay High Court, for example, have different procedural practices and court cultures. Understanding these regional variations helps law firms tailor their strategies and services to better meet local demands and navigate the specific challenges of each jurisdiction. It also highlights the importance of adaptability and local expertise in providing effective legal solutions across different cities.
Get in touch with Shruhita Amit-
