This interview has been published by Namrata Singh and The SuperLawyer Team
Hello and welcome, everyone! The SuperLawyer’s team is excited to bring you yet another insightful session today. If you are seeking inspiration through diversification and unwavering dedication, look no further—today’s guest embodies both.
We are honored to welcome Advocate Pinak Mitra, a respected figure in the legal community.
For those joining us today, let me briefly introduce our esteemed guest. Advocate Mitra is a distinguished lawyer at the High Court of Calcutta, serving as Counsel for the State of West Bengal. He is a distinguished Member of the International Council of Jurists and a National Board Member of the Indian Lawyers Association—yet this is just the beginning of his impressive journey.
With a dynamic practice spanning criminal law, constitutional law, consumer law, medico-legal issues, family law, and matrimonial disputes, Advocate Mitra’s legal expertise is truly vast. He continually upskills himself, delving into intellectual property law, and navigating the intricacies of economic offenses.
We are thrilled to have you with us today, sir. Thank you for graciously accepting our invitation and joining us to share your knowledge. Welcome, Advocate Mitra!
Thank you so much, Akash.
Sir, let’s begin with a topic that resonates with many young lawyers. Litigation, as we know, is a challenging path, and it can feel overwhelming, especially for those just starting out.
Given your remarkable achievements in this field, could you share with us how you navigated this journey and what drew you to pursue a career in litigation? We would love to hear about your experiences and the key insights that shaped your path
Actually, for me, law was never my first choice. I wanted to study medicine and become a doctor. Law was my second option. The reason I chose between medicine and law was that I wanted to be a professional and not have a job where I worked under an employer. I didn’t want to be just another employee. That’s precisely why medicine and law were my two options. After failing to crack the medical exams, I shifted my focus to law.
I managed to get into law, took the entrance exams—though without much preparation—and got into the Department of Law at the University of Calcutta for a five-year BA LLB course. Initially, it was very boring because we had several papers related to humanities, and I came from a science background. The first and second years were especially dull since we didn’t have semester exams at that time in Calcutta University. But once we started with the law subjects, things slowly became more interesting.
After graduating and joining court, I realized the stark contrast between what I had heard, seen on TV, and the reality. It’s very different from the common notion that lawyers are flashy people earning truckloads of money. The reality is that it’s a tough nut to crack, especially in the initial years, where you need a lot of resilience to sustain yourself.
I’ve seen many of my batchmates join court after graduating from law school, but within two or three years, their initial energy fizzles out. The struggle is real, especially when you see friends from other fields, like engineering or MBA, earning decent salaries, enjoying job security, buying cars, and investing. Meanwhile, someone who studied law and joined litigation finds it incredibly difficult, not just to sustain themselves, but even to ask family members for basic expenses to travel to court.
It’s quite embarrassing to ask for small amounts of money just to sustain yourself when you’re 24 or 25 years old and should ideally be independent. And when you see your friends with steady salaries, negativity can easily creep in. It’s challenging not to get depressed or bogged down by these realities and to just keep going. This is why some people, despite their potential, eventually give up or lose the patience to hang on after a few years. That’s the biggest challenge anyone entering litigation has to face.
Thank you, sir. Your insights are truly grounded in the practical realities that many face at the start of their careers. I believe the motivational mantra you shared at the beginning of this interview—to persist, remain resilient, and stay dedicated—will resonate deeply with everyone listening today.
Now, moving on to the next question: Your career has spanned the judicial hierarchy, from the trial courts to the High Court and eventually to the Supreme Court. Could you share with us your journey through these stages? Any memorable experiences, key moments, or valuable insights you’d like to pass on from your progression through these courts?
Yes, so I’ll tell you. During my five-year tenure in law school, I only did two internships. The first was as a judicial intern under a Supreme Court judge, and the second was in a trial court for three months. I didn’t have the chance to intern in the high court. There was a stark contrast between my experiences in the Supreme Court and the trial court.
I really enjoyed my time at the Supreme Court, watching the stalwarts of law argue, and I learned a great deal from them. On the other hand, when I returned to the trial court, especially in West Bengal, I found it very difficult to understand what was happening. What I was reading in my books didn’t seem to align with the reality of the trial court. There wasn’t much synchronization between the two. I’ve even heard judicial officers mention that each trial court seems to have its own separate procedures, which, as a law student, was quite shocking for me to hear and witness.
Now, that’s one side of the story. As far as the High Court and the Supreme Court go, particularly the Calcutta High Court, the standard there is exceptionally high and has been maintained over the years. Bengalis, as a community, are very academic in nature, which leads them to always engage in legal discussions and have a deep understanding of the nuances of law, both in letter and spirit.
In my opinion, if you’re practicing in the Calcutta High Court, dealing with complex legal issues or arguing a matter in the Supreme Court becomes relatively easier because of the high standards upheld here.
Now, coming back to the trial courts—without any offense, I have to say there are some brilliant trial court advocates in our state and across India. However, the problem is that their work often goes unrecognized because the judgments from trial courts are rarely reported. Even though they sometimes do a fantastic job, trial court lawyers don’t receive the recognition they deserve.
That’s another side of the story. The second aspect is that a law student or candidate must decide early on which area of practice they want to pursue. For example, if someone is interested in constitutional law, then the trial court is not an option, and they must focus on building their practice in the High Court or the Supreme Court.
On the other hand, if someone is passionate about trial court work, including examination and cross-examination, they should focus on trial courts or the original side of the High Court, where suits are filed and heard. So, it all depends on personal preference. One should first choose their area of practice and then make a decision accordingly. Also, gaining some internship experience in both trial courts and high courts is crucial to understand if they like the setup and environment because, ultimately, after graduation, they need to blend into that environment and become part of it.
In order to make an informed decision, it’s important to get a heads-up about these things beforehand. Otherwise, one might spend three or four years practicing in the High Court only to later realize they prefer trial court work. In such cases, they could end up losing two or three years of their practical life, even though they would have gained valuable experience.
That’s the problem. Experience-wise, they would certainly benefit, but in terms of establishing their own practice, they might lose those crucial years.
Sir, how was your experience when you first argued, represented, or took on a matter in the Supreme Court? Could you share what it was like transitioning from the state level to the Supreme Court?
During my internship at the Supreme Court, I had the unique opportunity to see a side of the Court that most lawyers don’t—working behind the scenes with a Supreme Court judge. This was especially insightful before the miscellaneous days, which are Mondays and Fridays. I saw firsthand how the research is done, and I gained an understanding of the level of preparation and efficiency involved when judges handle SLPs (Special Leave Petitions).
Usually, these hearings last just a few seconds, and at that time, we had to prepare a short note outlining the legal point involved so that the judge could quickly frame his mind. Everything moves very fast, and this experience was incredibly valuable during my internship.
The second significant experience was when I joined the bar at the High Court. At that time, the Criminal Motion Bench was headed by Justice Bagchi for a considerable period, and he was extremely fast. We had to be quick and precise in presenting ourselves, and that definitely helped me when preparing for SLP admissions as well. The way Justice Bagchi conducted motion admission hearings at the Calcutta High Court was very similar to how the Supreme Court handles SLP admissions.
This experience proved invaluable. You must know your brief inside out because you won’t have time to fumble through papers during the hearing. Even in a heavy matter, you might only get one minute to present, and there are always super seniors in the field of law arguing.
As a young lawyer, it’s particularly challenging to get an audience with a Supreme Court judge. You have to make an impact right away, like hitting a six on the first ball. That’s my approach to it.
Thank you so much, sir, for sharing these insights. This discussion feels like a technical workshop with all the nuances you’re imparting. I’m certain that individuals in independent litigation practice who aspire to reach the highest levels will greatly benefit from the wealth of experience you’ve brought to this session today.
Sir, your experience extends beyond India, encompassing both local and global perspectives. If your awe-inspiring trajectory were to be anchored in specific professional virtues, what would those virtues be? And would you be willing to share them with junior professionals?
When it comes to professional virtues, I would highlight three key qualities. First is discipline. There is no substitute for discipline; you need to maintain a fixed routine and adhere to it. This principle applies across all fields—law, politics, Bollywood, and beyond. Successful individuals, regardless of their profession, follow a rigorous and disciplined lifestyle.
The second quality is hard work, coupled with staying updated. Hard work is crucial, and it includes keeping abreast of developments in your field. Nowadays, we don’t wait for a Supreme Court bound volume to arrive; updates are provided through various websites and legal articles. Supreme Court decisions are reported within the same day. Embracing technology and staying informed is essential; otherwise, you risk being outpaced by your opponents if you aren’t up-to-date.
The third quality is the ability to build good public relations skills. In the legal field, especially as a lawyer, connecting with people socially is vital. Initially, clients may come through your relatives, friends, or referrals from teachers. Your network grows over time through these connections. Just as in medicine, where a patient’s choice of doctor is influenced by reputation and referrals, the same holds true for law. Effective social skills help in client acquisition, which in turn drives your success.
To summarize, discipline, hard work, and strong interpersonal skills are interconnected. Discipline ensures you stick to your routine, even on slow days. Hard work involves both effort and staying updated. Building social connections helps in gaining clients, which requires continued hard work. Each quality supports and enhances the others, creating a successful professional path.
Given that you have continually upskilled yourself through various courses and degrees, and considering the current legal landscape with its transformative changes across sectors, what are your thoughts on the legal and technological upskilling of lawyers? How should they adapt to these changes, and how significant is this process within the legal profession?
Regarding the integration of technology into the legal field, I believe it is no longer a choice but a necessity. Whether we like it or not, we have to adapt.
For instance, I recently visited the Supreme Court, which has nearly gone completely paperless. In contrast, the Calcutta High Court still relies heavily on paper and bulky briefs. During my recent appearance at the Supreme Court, my advocate on record provided me with a digital copy of the SLP. Even though I have a tablet and a MacBook, I am accustomed to holding a physical brief. Nonetheless, I tried to go paperless and use the digital copy.
It’s a matter of habit; initially, it was a bit challenging. I can only imagine the difficulties faced by senior members of the bar, who have been trained to handle physical books and documents. Personally, I still prefer having an SCC (Supreme Court Cases) in hand rather than reading judgments on a screen. It may be easier on the eyes, but we must embrace technology.
Furthermore, technology helps us stay updated. Without it, we would miss out on current developments. For a lawyer to grow and evolve, accepting technology is essential.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, courts adopted a hybrid model of physical and virtual hearings. After the pandemic, some high courts moved away from this model, but the Supreme Court mandated that hybrid hearings continue. This has been beneficial, though there is still some resistance to accepting virtual appearances. However, technology allows lawyers who are unwell or cannot afford junior lawyers to participate virtually and seek adjournments without harming their clients.
Technology has also improved court processes. Orders are now uploaded to the high court servers and e-courts, eliminating the need for certified copies. Additionally, we can now view which cases are being heard in which courtrooms via our phones, which was not possible in the past. This advancement saves time and effort compared to earlier practices where one had to physically check courtrooms or rely on clerks.
Another significant benefit of virtual hearings is that clients can observe their representation and proceedings. This transparency helps address issues where clients have been misled about hiring senior advocates or other concerns. Clients can now view hearings and understand the proceedings better.
In summary, technology is crucial in the legal field today, and there is no way to proceed without it in the current age.
Sir, what is the constant drive or motivating force that sustains you in your profession? Is there a particular philosophy or mantra that you believe in?
I have been quite inspired by the story of Mr. Ram Jethmalani. He has been a guiding force for me. During my internship days, I saw him argue a case in the Supreme Court on the principles of bail, and I was awestruck by his aura. After that, I read about him—his struggles and his journey as a lawyer—and I was fascinated by how he transformed himself.
Outside the realm of law, I would also say I have been inspired by the journey of Mr. Shah Rukh Khan. He has been a role model for me, not just as an actor but as a personality as well. His journey is incredible. These people have had a profound impact on my journey as a lawyer. They have motivated me, especially when I see how they faced failures and bounced back.
If you look at the trajectory of any successful person, they go through ups and downs. Even Mr. Amitabh Bachchan, the legend of Bollywood, experienced highs and lows, and his transformation later in life is remarkable. Figures like these—successful individuals in their respective fields—should serve as a motivation for others. Whether it’s sports, Bollywood, film, politics, or the legal field, their journeys and the challenges they faced can guide and inspire aspiring individuals.
Their stories have been a tremendous source of inspiration for me and have helped me in my own journey.
On that note, sir, a demanding profession like law can certainly take a toll on mental health. How do you manage the pressure of work while maintaining your personal space? Are there any hobbies, interests, or general routines you follow to strike a balance that you’d like to share?
Yes, law is very taxing. It is extremely demanding on our mental health as well, because it takes at least 14 to 15 hours of our daily life. Apart from that, you need time for your daily activities—sleep, rest, and spending time with your family. Unfortunately, if you’re in the field of law, especially as a litigating lawyer, you don’t get much time with your family. That is one of the hardest parts. You don’t get time to hang out with friends either.
Initially, you might, but as you become busier, the profession consumes a lot of your time, so you won’t be able to do that. Sometimes it becomes overwhelming. You might feel like taking an evening off to watch a movie or go out with friends or family, but then you remember you have cases the next day and need to study. You’re forced to study, and it can become very difficult and, at times, even depressing. I wouldn’t say it doesn’t. That’s one aspect—if you’re busy.
The other aspect is if you don’t have work, which many lawyers experienced during COVID. The pandemic was a huge eye-opener for everybody. Most courts weren’t functioning properly at first, though they eventually moved to a hybrid model and virtual hearings. But initially, it wasn’t like that.
So, for almost two years, many lawyers didn’t have work. At that time, it was very depressing and mentally challenging for lawyers to sustain themselves and take care of their families. Our profession is already very uncertain. I might have a very busy week now, and the next week, I could be completely without work.
During that free time, how you channel your thoughts is very important. It takes a huge mental toll on every serious lawyer because the insecurity looms large. As for me, I used to enjoy reading as a hobby. But after joining litigation, the profession has taken that hobby away from me. Now, in my free time, I hardly read books because I’m already reading so much during the day. So instead, I’ve taken to watching a lot of content on OTT platforms, which I enjoy.
Another principle I’ve maintained during my 10 years of practice is not going to court during the vacations. Many people work through the vacations, but I’ve made it a point not to work during the three vacations we have in Calcutta. For the good part of that time, I spend it with my family.
I love traveling a lot, so whenever I get the opportunity, I leave the city and go somewhere to spend some time. Traveling helps keep me refreshed. We have such an amazing country with so much to offer, and I love exploring the length and breadth of it. So, that’s how I unwind.
Since you’ve been involved in various editorial and pedagogical activities, where you’ve interacted with both students and practitioners, how do you think this involvement has enhanced your legal acumen and expertise? Additionally, how much do you enjoy these activities alongside your primary role in litigation?
Yes, actually, I would say it is very helpful, even for the growth of an individual as a lawyer. Let me share an anecdote: during my early years of practice, and even more recently during the COVID period, I used to mentor some law students, including my interns. Apart from them interning with me, I would teach them about the practical aspects of the legal field and different statutes that aren’t covered in their syllabus.
I also gave them basic insights into how cases are filed, conducted, and so on. In addition, I was involved in editing journals for CHN at one point in time. This experience was helpful in two main ways. Firstly, for the purpose of editing, I had to go through judgments passed by various courts. In the process of reading those judgments, I was constantly updating myself as a lawyer.
Secondly, reading judgments for editing purposes allowed me to cover a lot of material in a short span of time. This not only increased my reading speed but also improved my ability to quickly identify the key portions of a judgment.
Thirdly, dealing with different aspects of law—whether with law students or fellow lawyers—helped me revise what I had learned earlier, either during law school or later in practice. For example, while I may have studied the Domestic Violence Act or the Negotiable Instruments Act thoroughly during my college days, in practice, we mostly focus on a few sections like Sections 138 to 143, 143A of the NI Act. However, when discussing the entire statute with a student or fellow lawyer, it forces you to revisit and refresh your knowledge of the full text.
In a way, by teaching others, you’re also learning and revising. This helps to reinforce your understanding of the law and ensures you don’t forget important sections. So, it definitely aids in personal growth and keeps you sharp as a lawyer.
Thank you, sir. As a concluding note, could you please share your long-term plans, particularly in light of your impressive involvement with various professional legal groups and associations? What are your long-term goals?
This is a very difficult question for me to answer. In terms of long-term plans, as an individual, I aim to advocate for the cause of law to a certain extent. I also plan to author a few books in the field of law, which I will likely begin working on soon. These books will offer a more practical insight into certain aspects of law, focusing on topics that I choose. The goal is for these books to be beneficial not only for law students but also for legal practitioners.
There are numerous books on various legal topics available in the market, but I’ve observed that some of them exist just for the sake of being there. They don’t provide a proper or meaningful insight into the areas of law they cover. That’s one side of it. On the other hand, I have a long-term plan to establish a legal institute that imparts practical legal training to students.
When or how this institute will materialize, I can’t say. It may never happen, or it could happen in the near future, but I believe it’s very important. Many people who enter law school are not from legal backgrounds, and the five years of legal education often don’t provide sufficient practical knowledge. That’s my perspective on that.
Additionally, many law colleges today focus on ensuring students complete a set number of internships, but it doesn’t necessarily mean that students are learning anything valuable during those internships. It has become more of a target-oriented task—complete the internship, get the certificate, and move on.
However, in reality, interns who come to courts or law offices aren’t truly learning much. I regularly have interns at my law office, and it’s a practice in my office to interact with them after a week or so. I make sure to ask for their feedback on their previous internships—whether it was in someone else’s chamber or a law firm—and also about what they have learned while working with me. If they come here, they should leave with something productive that will help them in their careers.
These are the aspects I want to focus on as part of my long-term plans in the field of law. So, let’s see where this journey takes me.
A very big thanks from the entire team of SuperLawyer. Thank you so much.
Thank you, Akash, for having me. It was truly a pleasure to discuss various aspects of our day-to-day professional lives and to share a glimpse into how I maintain balance in my personal life as well. I’m confident that young lawyers will find value in this, as it will help them gain a better understanding of the practical realities in the legal field. Thank you once again for having me.
Get in touch with Pinak Mitra-
